<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FoxLand &#187; Technical</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fox-land.co.uk/category/technical/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fox-land.co.uk</link>
	<description>Brand + Design + Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 07:47:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Inayaili writes for Smashing Magazine again</title>
		<link>http://www.fox-land.co.uk/2009/08/17/inayaili-writes-for-smashing-magazine-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fox-land.co.uk/2009/08/17/inayaili-writes-for-smashing-magazine-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Fox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fox-land.co.uk/?p=1378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CSS is one of the most powerful tools that is available to web designers (if not the most powerful). With it we can completely transform the look of a website in just a couple of minutes, and without even having to touch the markup. But despite the fact that we are all well aware of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>CSS is one of the most powerful tools that is available to web designers (if not the most powerful). With it we can completely transform the look of a website in just a couple of minutes, and without even having to touch the markup. But despite the fact that we are all well aware of its usefulness, CSS selectors are still not used to their full potential and we sometimes have the tendency to litter our HTML with excessive and unnecessary classes and ids, divs and spans.</p>
<p>The best way to avoid these plagues spreading in your markup and keep it clean and semantic, is by using more complex CSS selectors, ones that can target specific elements without the need of a class or an id, and by doing that keep our code and our stylesheets flexible.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Inayaili has written another article for Smashing Magazine, this time on <a href="http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/08/17/taming-advanced-css-selectors/">“Taming Advanced CSS Selectors”</a>.  It’s technical and in-depth — we would recommend it for serious web designers everywhere. Her last article for Smashing Magazine called <a href="http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/06/15/take-your-design-to-the-next-level-with-css3/">“Take Your Design To The Next Level With CSS3”</a> got to number 1 on Digg and Delicious, so <a href="http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/08/17/taming-advanced-css-selectors/">go take a look</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fox-land.co.uk/2009/08/17/inayaili-writes-for-smashing-magazine-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CAPTCHAs aren’t worth it</title>
		<link>http://www.fox-land.co.uk/2009/07/29/captchas-arent-worth-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fox-land.co.uk/2009/07/29/captchas-arent-worth-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Fox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fox-land.co.uk/?p=1253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone hates CAPTCHAs — those hard-to-read squiggles of text and numbers that you sometimes need to decipher before you can use a website — but now someone has done some research and it looks like they aren’t worth it. While they helped stop spam, the effect on the failure of conversions in site sign-up was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone hates CAPTCHAs — those hard-to-read squiggles of text and numbers that you sometimes need to decipher before you can use a website — but now <a title="seomoz.org: CAPTCHAs' Effect on Conversion Rates" href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/captchas-affect-on-conversion-rates">someone has done some research and it looks like they aren’t worth it</a>. While they helped stop spam, the effect on the failure of conversions in site sign-up was worse. (via <a href="http://cnolle.com">Christian</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fox-land.co.uk/2009/07/29/captchas-arent-worth-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why support Internet Explorer 6?</title>
		<link>http://www.fox-land.co.uk/2009/07/11/why-support-internet-explorer-6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fox-land.co.uk/2009/07/11/why-support-internet-explorer-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Fox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fox-land.co.uk/site2/?p=1083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Popular link sharing website Digg recently considered removing functionality from the site as they spent so much time trying to get things to work with the ancient web browser. With that in mind they did some research into their users — the findings weren’t great news for web designers. Take a look at their research [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Popular link sharing website Digg recently considered removing functionality from the site as they spent so much time trying to get things to work with the ancient web browser. With that in mind they did some research into their users — the findings weren’t great news for web designers. <a href="http://blog.digg.com/?p=878">Take a look at their research results here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fox-land.co.uk/2009/07/11/why-support-internet-explorer-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Websites still not up to standard</title>
		<link>http://www.fox-land.co.uk/2009/04/14/websites-still-not-up-to-standard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fox-land.co.uk/2009/04/14/websites-still-not-up-to-standard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 06:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Fox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fox-land.co.uk/?p=574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Computerworld discusses why even in 2009, 10 years after the Web Standards Project was founded, and after huge strides from all the browser makers (including Microsoft with the release of IE8), users still find that there are major problems using websites.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="When good browsers go bad—and they all do" href="http://www.macworld.com/article/139963/2009/04/browsers.html">Computerworld discusses</a> why even in 2009, 10 years after the <a title="The Web Standards Project is a grassroots coalition fighting for standards which ensure simple, affordable access to web technologies for all" href="http://www.webstandards.org/">Web Standards Project</a> was founded, and after huge strides from all the browser makers (including Microsoft with the release of IE8), users still find that there are major problems using websites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fox-land.co.uk/2009/04/14/websites-still-not-up-to-standard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The problem with Content Management Systems</title>
		<link>http://www.fox-land.co.uk/2009/02/04/the-problem-with-content-management-systems/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fox-land.co.uk/2009/02/04/the-problem-with-content-management-systems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 06:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Fox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fox-land.co.uk/?p=500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A good Content Management System (CMS) can be a fantastic help for people to easily update their website while keeping design consistent and use supporting technologies (such as RSS or clean, SEO-friendly semantic code). That said, if you use a CMS limitations and costs inevitably occur -it is a case of balance and what is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good Content Management System (CMS) can be a fantastic help for people to easily update their website while keeping design consistent and use supporting technologies (such as RSS or clean, SEO-friendly semantic code). That said, if you use a CMS limitations and costs inevitably occur -it is a case of balance and what is important for your website. For example, in some situations a website that is highly focused on marketing a product or service and needs to be highly stylised may well find a CMS a hindrance. Paul Boag discusses some of these issues in his article <a title="The 5 hidden costs of running a CMS" href="http://thinkvitamin.com/dev/the-5-hidden-costs-of-running-a-cms/">The 5 Hidden Costs of Running a CMS</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fox-land.co.uk/2009/02/04/the-problem-with-content-management-systems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The problem with virus detection&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.fox-land.co.uk/2008/10/24/the-problem-with-virus-detection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fox-land.co.uk/2008/10/24/the-problem-with-virus-detection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Fox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fox-land.co.uk/?p=402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike Davidson from Newsvine talks about how anti-virus software regularly can create more problems than they solve. We have even had issues when users simply click on a regular drop-down menu &#8211; and then nothing happens.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike Davidson from Newsvine talks about <a title="The only thing worse than viruses" href="http://www.mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2008/10/the-only-thing-worse-than-viruses...">how anti-virus software regularly can create more problems than they solve</a>. We have even had issues when users simply click on a regular drop-down menu &#8211; and then nothing happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fox-land.co.uk/2008/10/24/the-problem-with-virus-detection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The browser wars: part 57 or so</title>
		<link>http://www.fox-land.co.uk/2008/09/02/the-browser-wars-part-57-or-so/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fox-land.co.uk/2008/09/02/the-browser-wars-part-57-or-so/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Fox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fox-land.co.uk/?p=370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yet another opening has occurred in the long running war of the browsers&#8230; admittedly a war not many people are that interested in anymore &#8211; instead ‘web standards’ won.  But back to the war. The most interesting news is that Google have announced a new web browser called Chrome. My favourite feature is that it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-371" title="googlechrome" src="http://www.fox-land.co.uk/site2/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/googlechrome.gif" alt="" width="500" height="131" /></a></p>
<p>Yet another opening has occurred in the long running war of the browsers&#8230; admittedly a war not many people are that interested in anymore &#8211; instead ‘web standards’ won.  But back to the war.</p>
<p>The most interesting news is that <a title="Google's comic book introduction to Chrome" href="http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/">Google have announced a new web browser called Chrome</a>. My favourite feature is that it has been launched via a gorgeous and quirky comic by <a title="Scott McCloud's website" href="http://www.scottmccloud.com/">Scott McCloud</a> (creator of the fantastic Understanding Comics). As for persuading a significant number of regular people to actually use it,  I feel it will be a hard sell. There are features that developers and geeks will appreciate (we do!), but it has been hard enough to persuade people they should move from Internet Explorer 6, which is dangerous, let alone to think about moving to yet another browser after they may have made the effort to move to Firefox or Internet Explorer 7. It is also (arguably) quite ugly, which won&#8217;t help. That said, many of the ideas behind it are very interesting from a developers point-of-view and it may well become a very interesting browser in the future.</p>
<p>The other news, less interesting or fun, but news that will probably have more impact on the world in a practical way, is that <a title="IE8 beta 2 is out" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2008/08/27/internet-explorer-8-beta-2-now-available.aspx">Internet Explorer 8 has reached the next stage of development</a>. When it actually comes out is anyone&#8217;s guess, but it will probably be much more important to web developers in an everyday sense than Chrome will be &#8211; at least for the foreseeable future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fox-land.co.uk/2008/09/02/the-browser-wars-part-57-or-so/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Basecamp to phase out support for Internet Explorer 6</title>
		<link>http://www.fox-land.co.uk/2008/07/08/basecamp-to-phase-out-support-for-internet-explorer-6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fox-land.co.uk/2008/07/08/basecamp-to-phase-out-support-for-internet-explorer-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Fox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kendal.webfactional.com/?p=337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[37signals, a company that builds web-based applications, are to phase out support for Microsoft’s Internet Explorer 6 (IE6) for their products, including Basecamp (the project management tool we use extensively to run our various projects). In many ways we support this move. IE6 came out in August 2001: that’s almost 7 years ago. While it was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>37signals, a company that builds web-based applications, are to <a title="Phasing out support for IE 6 across all 37signals products on August 15, 2008" href="http://37signals.blogs.com/products/2008/07/basecamp-phasin.html">phase out support for Microsoft’s Internet Explorer 6</a> (IE6) for their products, including Basecamp (the project management tool we use extensively to run our various projects).</p>
<p>In many ways we support this move. IE6 came out in August 2001: that’s almost 7 years ago. While it was a real step forward at the time it has since seriously lagged behind other web browsers. It now is responsible for creating an inordinate amount of design and development problems for people who work with the web, as well as having a wide variety of security issues. It will be a great day when the web development world can finally move on. Unfortunately we believe it could easily be another 5 years before this might be possible — there are simply too many people using it.</p>
<p>The percentage of people using IE6 varies widely depending on the type of website and their audience, but looking at the statistics of websites we manage, it is approximately between 15% and 35%.  Clearly a very significant proportion still use IE6, and one that can not be ignored. While websites do not need to look exactly the same in each and every browser, but they should not break or fail to work.</p>
<p>The move by 37signals has created various issues for us:</p>
<p>We do not want to overly concern our clients about what web browser they use. Most people neither know nor care about what browser they are using &#8211; and why should they? We would always encourage clients to upgrade their browsers to the most recent because of the security risks, but for medium to large organisations universally upgrading their browsers can be a very complex task.</p>
<p>The situation could also impact on our credibility: we have recommended Basecamp as a tool, and if suddenly some of our clients have problems using it, it would reflect poorly on us. Having the situation ‘taken out of our hands’ by 37signals puts us in an uncomfortable position.</p>
<h4>Information for clients</h4>
<p>We recommend that clients upgrade to the latest versions of <a title="Microsoft's Internet Explorer 7 (Windows only)" href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/downloads/ie/getitnow.mspx?wt_svl=10005WDH_OS_Other1&amp;mg_id=10005WDHb1">Internet Explorer</a>, <a title="Mozilla's Firefox" href="http://www.mozilla.com/">Firefox</a> or <a title="Apple's Safari" href="http://www.apple.com/safari/download/">Safari</a>. If this is difficult due to the restrictions of IT departments, then glitches or problems with Basecamp will probably occur. Hopefully these should not cause significant or ‘fatal’ problems. Please contact us if you have any questions or experience any errors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fox-land.co.uk/2008/07/08/basecamp-to-phase-out-support-for-internet-explorer-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
